Skip to content Skip to navigation

Unsolicited Cell Phone Calls

Cell Phone in Circle with Strikethrough

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) is designed to protect not only individuals but also businesses which are consumers and which may be plagued by telemarketing calls. The plaintiff in this class action is a business, and the complaint alleges that it received unlawful telemarketing calls from Affinity Home Enterprises, Inc., which does business as Arrow Pacific Insurance Services.

When Congress passed the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), it recognized that “[u]nrestricted telemarketing … can be an intrusive invasion of privacy.” The TCPA was meant to protect consumers from unwanted calls, but the complaint for this class action alleges that Palmco Energy PA, LLC, which does business as Indra Energy, violates that law and places telemarketing calls to consumer cell phones.

Housecall Pro Logo

Codefied, Inc., which does businesss as Housecall Pro, is paying more than $2 million to settle a class action alleging that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The complaint alleged that the company sent autodialed texts and calls to individuals without their consent.

Policeman Reaching Out of Cell Phone

Pr.Business, whose official name is Public Reputation Management Services, LLC, offers marketing services. Unfortunately, the complaint for this class action alleges that the company promotes these services by illegal telemarketing messages to consumer cell phones, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).

Marcus Logo with Robin Hood Hat

Debt collectors must obey the provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). This complaint brings suit against Goldman Sachs Bank USA as a class action for debt collection attempts that violate the TCPA and individually under the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA). Goldman Sachs Bank USA is also known as Marcus by Goldman Sachs.

Cell Phone in Circle with Strikethrough

This class action brings suit against GC Services under the federal laws Telephone Consumer Protection Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and under California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA). The complaint alleges that GC Services, LP violates all three in its attempts to collect consumer debts.

Cell Phone in Circle with Strikethrough

Some of the most common class actions are those that bring suit under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The complaint for this class action sues two companies for violations of the TCPA—Barclays Bank Delaware and Premier Union Trust, which does business as Second Choice Horizon (SCH).

Robot with Headphones at Desktop Computer

One of the most common types of class action brings suit against telemarketers under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In this case, the complaint alleges that LendUp Global, Inc. violated the TCPA by contacting consumer cell phones using an automatic dialing system and/or an artificial or prerecorded voice.

Choice Home Warranty Logo

What is there to say about the number of companies that continue to violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)? The complaint for this class action alleges that Home Warranty Administrator of Arizona and CHW Group, Inc. (which does business as Choice Home Warranty) are the culprits, contacting consumer cell phones in violation of the law. 

Cox Communications Logo

Cox Communications is paying more than $10 million to settle a class action alleging it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The complaint alleged that Cox placed calls to consumer cell phones, using automatic dialing systems or an artificial or prerecorded voice, even though the consumers were not Cox customers.

Pages