Skip to content Skip to navigation

Antitrust

image of econozole cream

This lawsuit claims that Fougera engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the prices of their Econazole antifungal cream by making agreements with generic manufacturers to keep prices high.

image of provigil label

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that Cephalon and Teva Pharmaceuticals violated federal and state antitrust laws by delaying the sale of generic, low-cost versions of Provigil.

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that Fiat Chrysler (FCA) has engaged in and continues to engage in a performance driving program dubbed “Volume Growth Program” (VGP) in which dealers that sell higher volumes of vehicles can attain a VGP status.  The VGP program provides dealerships subsidies on each and every new motor vehicles sale that other dealerships cannot attain and has led to many dealers falsifying sales reports.  This unfair competition scheme sows a “pattern of racketeering activity” and has allowed to company to used false sales numbers to increase its stock as well as invest in conspiring dealerships.

This lawsuit alleges that 1-800 Contacts engaged in price fixing and collusion by preventing online competition in the market for contact-lenses.  This was done by entering into agreements with competitors that restricted bidding on advertising on Google by keywords and forcing competitors to advertise based on “negative” key words.  These actions violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, California’s Cartwright Act, and California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Image of chicken crossing the road

How many chickens crossed the road?  This lawsuit alleges not nearly as many as should have! It alleges that for at least four years the largest chicken producers took unprecedented steps to jointly manage the output of “broilers” and therefore violated federal and state antitrust laws.

image of UPMC logo

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that since 2002, UPMC and Highmark have participated in a conspiracy to reduce competition in the markets for health insurance and certain health care services in Western Pennsylvania in violation of federal antitrust laws. The lawsuit claims this behavior:

image of a cargo liner

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that the companies (listed below) conspired, in violation of antitrust laws, to fix the prices for freight forwarding services during certain time periods. The Plaintiffs claim that the companies’ conspiracies were worldwide, including on shipping routes between the United States and China, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.

image of a glass of milk being poured

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege a nationwide conspiracy by CWT and its members to limit the production of raw farm milk by prematurely slaughtering cows, in order to illegally increase the price of milk and other fresh milk products. 

image of flat screen TV

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit claim that the Defendants conspired to fix, raise, maintain or stabilize prices of TFT-LCD Flat Panels resulting in overcharges to consumers who bought products containing the TFT-LCD Flat Panels in Illinois between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2006. 

image of prescripion medication

The plaintiffs in this case allege that Shire U.S., Inc.

Pages