Skip to content Skip to navigation

Antitrust

image of bagged ice

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that Home City Ice Company and other competitors engaged in an antitrust scheme to fix and raise the price of packaged bags of ice.

image of dow logo

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that Dow unlawfully agreed to fix, raise, maintain or stabilize the prices of Polyether Polyol Products sold in the United States and its territories during the period from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2004 in violation of the federal antitrust laws.

image of econozole cream

This lawsuit claims that Fougera engaged in a conspiracy to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the prices of their Econazole antifungal cream by making agreements with generic manufacturers to keep prices high.

image of provigil label

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that Cephalon and Teva Pharmaceuticals violated federal and state antitrust laws by delaying the sale of generic, low-cost versions of Provigil.

This lawsuit alleges that 1-800 Contacts engaged in price fixing and collusion by preventing online competition in the market for contact-lenses.  This was done by entering into agreements with competitors that restricted bidding on advertising on Google by keywords and forcing competitors to advertise based on “negative” key words.  These actions violate the Sherman Antitrust Act, California’s Cartwright Act, and California’s Unfair Competition Law.

Image of chicken crossing the road

How many chickens crossed the road?  This lawsuit alleges not nearly as many as should have! It alleges that for at least four years the largest chicken producers took unprecedented steps to jointly manage the output of “broilers” and therefore violated federal and state antitrust laws.

image of UPMC logo

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that since 2002, UPMC and Highmark have participated in a conspiracy to reduce competition in the markets for health insurance and certain health care services in Western Pennsylvania in violation of federal antitrust laws. The lawsuit claims this behavior:

image of a cargo liner

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that the companies (listed below) conspired, in violation of antitrust laws, to fix the prices for freight forwarding services during certain time periods. The Plaintiffs claim that the companies’ conspiracies were worldwide, including on shipping routes between the United States and China, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.

image of a glass of milk being poured

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege a nationwide conspiracy by CWT and its members to limit the production of raw farm milk by prematurely slaughtering cows, in order to illegally increase the price of milk and other fresh milk products. 

image of flat screen TV

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit claim that the Defendants conspired to fix, raise, maintain or stabilize prices of TFT-LCD Flat Panels resulting in overcharges to consumers who bought products containing the TFT-LCD Flat Panels in Illinois between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2006. 

Pages